GMAT

 Home         Contact Us About Us
Critical Reasoning (GMAT)
One of the types of critical reasoning questions you'll see on the GMAT is the assumption. An assumption bridges the gap between an argument's evidence and conclusion. It's a piece of support that isn't explicitly stated but that is required for the conclusion to remain valid. When a question asks you to find an author's assumption, it's asking you to find the statement without which the argument falls apart.


Prepare GMAT
GMAT
 GMAT
  • GMAC
  • GMAT General Info
  • Scope of GMAT
  • GMAT Test Format
  • How CAT Works
  • GMAT Strategies
  • Scoring Guide
  • Validity of GMAT
  •  MBA
  • What is MBA
  • Scope of MBA
  • MBA for You
  • Good MBA Candidate
  •  MBA in Pakistan
  • LUMS
  • IBA Karachi
  • BZU Multan
  •  GMAT Resources
    Downloads
    Recommended Books
    GMAT Preparation
     
    GMAT Community
    GMAT Community
    Admissions
    Criteria and Essay
    Interview
    Recommendation Letter
    Work Experience
    Your Previous GPA
    GMAT Score
    Time of Application
    US Top Business Schools
    Critical Reasoning (GMAT) Strategies

    In order to test whether a statement is necessarily assumed by an author, we can employ the Denial Test. Simply deny or negate the statement and see if the argument falls apart. If it does, that choice is a necessary assumption. If, on the other hand, the argument is unaffected, the choice is wrong.

    Consider the following example:

    Allyson plays volleyball for Central High School. Therefore, Allyson must be over six feet tall.

    You should recognize the second sentence as the conclusion and the first sentence as the evidence for it. But is the argument complete? Obviously not. The piece that's missing is the assumption, and you could probably prephrase this one pretty easily:

    All volleyball players for Central High School are over six feet tall.

    Now, let's use the Denial Test. What if it's not true that all volleyball players for Central High School are over six feet tall? Can we still logically conclude that Allyson must be taller than six feet? No, we can't. Sure, it's possible that she is, but it's also possible that she's not. By denying the statement, then, the argument falls to pieces; it's simply no longer valid. And that's our conclusive proof that the statement above is a necessary assumption of this argument.




    Home | GMAT | MBA | About Us | Contact Us | Privacy Statement | Disclaimer
    Excellance in Test Prparation College of Admission Tests